No Sex In J.Lo Sex Tape

As we've in the old days reported, Jennifer Lopez is suing her ex Ojani Noa and his spokeswoman Ed Meyer for attempting to manumission a private tape that reportedly contained sexually crystal-clear material of the two.
But according to J.Lo's barrister John Lavely "there wasn't anything stingy to sex" in the tape.
So does this low the her ex was telling the truly?
Jenny's lawyer goes on to respond the tape in question is "appease private and personal to my shopper."
We agree!
Hopefully that temporary restraining hierarchy blocking the mooch from making rake-off rich off their marriage becomes permanent!
What do U imagine? Should he be allowed to discharge personal tapes? Or not since he signed a confidentiality harmony years back?
[Image via WENN.]
original is here